I came across a quote by a politician I could get
excited about. He wrote: “I am not bound to win, but I am bound to be true. I
am not bound to succeed, but I am bound to live up to what light I have.”
That’s an amazing statement. He meant it, too. The
trouble is, he won’t be on the ballot. That’s because the man who spoke those
words was our sixteenth president, Abraham Lincoln.
That sort of integrity seems like the rarest of
elements among many in leadership today. It’s true of contemporary politics,
and sadly, the same thing might be said of leadership in the Church.
We can teach leadership skills, but each of us must choose
integrity.
Consider Israel’s first two kings, Saul and David. Both
were chosen by God Himself. Each shared similar temperaments and strengths. But
one king ended his reign in ignominy, and the other continues to be esteemed
today. What made the difference?
Both Saul and David physically attractive men; Saul stood
a head taller than his peers, and David was ruddy and handsome. Both displayed
authentic humility when Samuel anointed them to become the leader of the
nation. Both were actively involved in humble work. Saul was hunting for his
father’s stray donkeys; David was herding his father’s sheep.
Saul tried to deflect the attention from himself by
responding to Samuel’s pronouncement that he was to be the king of Israel,
protesting, “But am I not a Benjamite, from the smallest of tribe of Israel,
and is not my clan the least of all the clans of Benjamin? Who do you say such
things to me?” (1 Samuel 9:21). Saul even withheld from his uncle the news about
his new status. In fact, on the day of his coronation Saul was hiding among the
baggage.
David was retrieved from the sheepfold when Samuel came
to anoint him to replace King Saul. There is no record in Scripture of David
flaunting that he was the heir apparent to the throne. In fact, he entered the
palace to play his harp to calm King Saul’s troubled emotions. He fought as a
soldier under Saul’s command.
We discover another similarity at their coronation when
both were filled with the Holy Spirit. We read that ”God changed Saul’s heart…
and the Spirit of God came upon him in power…” (1 Samuel 10:9, 10). As for David,
“Samuel took the horn of oil and anointed him in the presence of his brothers,
and from that day on the Spirit of the Lord came upon David in power” (1 Samuel
16:13).
There we have it! Both men had the blessing of God’s
Spirit before they even began to reign. Tragically, the very next verse (1
Samuel 16:14) almost screams for a response:
“Now the Spirit of the Lord had departed from Saul and an evil spirit
from the Lord tormented him.” Whether I like it or not, the text says that God
ordained this evil spirit, perhaps some type of mental disorder, to plague
Saul. Surely there had to be a reason for this severe discipline. And there was.
Soon we discover a fatal flaw in Saul’s character.
Both men were fallible, and fell into sin. But what
happened when the sin of each was exposed? Their responses were like night and
day.
Saul displayed impatience and a lack of faith when he foolishly
assumed the role of priest before a battle. He had waited the prescribed seven
days for Samuel’s arrival, but the prophet was apparently running late.
Israel’s citizen-soldiers, already fearful of the impending battle, began to
slip away. Rejecting Samuel’s instructions, Saul took the bull by the horns and
offered the burnt sacrifices on his own.
On the surface, his offense may seem trivial. After
all, Samuel should have been punctual! Responding to Samuel’s interrogation,
Saul explained that he was compelled to offer the burnt offering (1 Samuel
13:12). (I hear a not-too-subtle attempt to blame Samuel’s tardiness.)
Samuel’s rebuke must have shaken the young king to the
core. God’s spokesman declared that God had rejected Saul’s kingship, and that
another man—with a heart for God—would replace him.
Years rolled by, and Saul once again disobeyed God’s direct
command. You can read about it in 1 Samuel 15. After a dramatic military
victory Saul spared the king of the Amalekites and the best of their livestock.
Whatever logic Saul might have been using, it was sheer disobedience. Not to
mention the fact that Saul built a monument for himself at Mt. Carmel to honor
his tainted victory.
Exposed by the bleating of the cattle, Samuel confronted
Saul about sparing the livestock. Backed in a corner, Saul sputtered and hedged,
trying to pass off the blame on his soldiers. Finally, the angry prophet shouted,
“Stop!” Only then did Saul finally admit his sin. But as you will see in
the account, he seemed a lot more concerned about his public opinion polls than
what the God of heaven thought about his disobedience.
David wasn’t perfect by a long shot. The sins we
remember about him are recorded in 2 Samuel 11 and 12. Strolling on the palace roof
in the cool night air he saw a beautiful woman bathing. An innocent glance became
a lustful look. Abusing his power as king he ordered servants to retrieve
Bathsheba for a one-night-stand in the royal bedroom—before sending her home
before dawn to conceal any evidence. But God knew.
Weeks passed, making it appear that David’s sin would
remain secret. But then the message arrived: Bathsheba was pregnant. Her
husband, one of David’s most valiant soldiers, was away from home fighting a
war. David’s first response to hide his sin and save face resembled Saul. But before
we stone David, isn’t that our normal response when we are confronted by
sin?
You know the story. David sought to preserve his
reputation by bringing Bathsheba’s husband Uriah home for a little R & R.
Uriah, however, proved to have more integrity than the king, refusing point
blank to go home to sleep with his wife while his comrades faced peril and death
on the battlefield. Even getting Uriah drunk failed. David considered his
options and ended up plotting Uriah’s destruction—sending him back to the front
lines with his own death warrant in hand.
Free at last, David married Bathsheba and his dirty
little secret remained safely hidden. But not from the Lord—who sent Nathan the
prophet to confront David, exposing his sin of adultery and murder.
This is where we discover the real difference between
Saul and David.
David’s response? “I have sinned against the Lord.”
That’s it. No blaming. No excuses. No minimizing. Just
honest confession. “You’re right. I did it. I am guilty.”
To really understand David’s brokenness read his prayer
of confession in Psalm 51. Overwhelmed by guilt he cries for mercy. With a
truly broken heart, he prays, “Blot out my transgressions…. Wash away all my
iniquity… Against you, you only, have I sinned and done what is evil in your
sight.”
Realizing the depth and gravity of his sins, David went
on: “Cleanse me… wash me… blot out … create in me a new heart …” David’s
passion for God is revealed in these words, “Do not cast me from your presence
or take your Holy Spirit from me.”
David had walked with God through severe times. While
hiding from Saul in the desert wilderness he could say, “Though I pass through
the valley of the shadow of death, you are with me.” But now he sensed the
distance he had placed between himself and his Shepherd and Guide—and he
couldn’t bear it. David could endure the rejection of people and their crude
gossip, but he could not tolerate the thought of another moment separated from
God’s presence.
Martin
Luther wrote in a letter to his friend Melanchthon, “God does not save those who are only imaginary sinners. Be a sinner, and let your sins be strong [or sin
boldly], but let your trust in Christ be stronger, and rejoice in Christ who is
the victor over sin, death, and the world.”
Luther wasn’t advocating sinning deliberately so God’s grace could abound
(Romans 6:1). Rather, he was calling for brutal honesty in confessing our sin
to God. That’s exactly what John wrote: “If we confess (admit) our sin, He
(God) is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sin and to cleanse us from
all unrighteousness” (1 John 1:9).
That’s integrity. That’s what God expects from us. Remove the mask and all
those attempts to appear righteous. Just ‘fess up.
Saul sought the approval of the people and lost his heart for God. David sought
God’s approval because he had a heart for God.
That is why David, even with adultery and murder on his rap sheet, is
called “a man after God’s own heart.” He was far from perfect, but so
passionately in love with our holy God that he couldn’t tolerate the thought of
losing that fellowship, that intimate friendship he had loved since boyhood.
We rightly concern ourselves about the
integrity of our politicians. But what about that person looking back at us in
the mirror?